Showing posts with label advertising. Show all posts
Showing posts with label advertising. Show all posts

Monday, September 20, 2010

art and advertising

Art can be any object that has been reclassified and reinterpreted so that they have been imbued with additional value besides usefulness.

A BMW is not just a car. It is a driving experience. It is intelligence. It is status.

A diamond is not just a stone. It is a signal and commitment of one's love.

Human values are commodified into objects, and then bought and sold on a market. Advertising is the process in which this commodification occurs.

Advertisers are artists.






Friday, September 3, 2010

human nature wants prestige, not happiness



The Chinese sage Lao Tzu warned people to make their own choices and not pursue the material objects everyone else was pursuing:

Racing and hunting madden the mind.

Precious things lead one astray.

Therefore the sage is guided by what he feels and not by what he sees.

He lets go of that and chooses this.

Unfortunately, letting go of one thing and choosing another is difficult if the elephant wraps his trunk around the "precious thing" and refuses to let go. The elephant was shaped by natural selection to win at the game of life, and part of its strategy is to impress others, gain their admiration, and rise in relative rank. The elephant cares about prestige, not happiness, and it looks eternally to others to figure out what is prestigious. The elephant will pursue its evolutionary goals even when greater happiness can be found elsewhere. If everyone is chasing the same limited amount of prestige, then all are stuck in a zero-sum game, an eternal arms race, a world in which rising wealth does not bring rising happiness. The pursuit of luxury goods is a happiness trap; it is a dead end that people race toward in the mistaken belief that it will make them happy.

- Johnathan Haidt


Friday, August 27, 2010

selected quotes on advertising

Advertising has lost its power to put a new brand name into the mind. Advertising has no credibility with consumers, who are increasingly skeptical of its claims and whenever possible are inclined to reject its messages.

To be effective, advertising doesn’t need creativity. It needs credibility.

When a communication technique loses its functional purpose, it turns into an art form.

The goal of traditional advertising is to not to make the product famous. The goal of traditional advertising is to make the advertising famous. Instead of creating sales value, traditional advertising attempts to create talk value.

Advertising expenditures are often like legal expenditures. Both can be negative indicators. A company with big legal bills is not necessarily a company on the way up.

The true function of advertising is to reinforce an existing perception in the mind.

The best advertising programs have an “I knew that before, but I’m glad you reminded me” quality. “A diamond is forever,” DeBeers’ long-running campaign, is in that category. Rather than being information-laden, the best advertising programs are usually emotion-laden (the cheerleading analogy).

- Al Ries


Monday, August 16, 2010

Painting is dead!

Painting is dead even though painting is more popular today that it ever was.

When it comes to painting, its "death" is not the death of painting itself, but the death of its function as a representation of reality.

A camera is infinitely better at depicting reality than any painter.

How do you measure the value of a candle? You can't measure its value by light output, since the candle has lost its function as JC of lighting a room. The years that followed Thomas Alva invention of the incandescent lamp might have been called "the fall of the candle and the rise of the lightbulb."

Yet every night all over America millions of candles are burning. No romantic dinner is complete without candles on the table. Individual candles are sold for $20 or $30 each, much more than a lightbulb. Unlike an electric bulb, the value of a candle has no relationship to its light output. Like the fireplace and the sailing ship, the candle has lost its function and turned into art.

Every form of artwork has its passionate defenders. They will strenuously argue over the value of an individual piece of artwork because there isn't an objective way to measure its value.


Before the age of photography, painting was used to communicate the liknesses of kings and queens, princes and princesses, throughout a kingdom. Paintings also let the next generation know what previous generations looked like. Before the age of photography, Rembrandt, Rubens, Raphael, Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, and other famous artists invariably painted in a realistic style.

Painting is just as popular today as it was in Rembrandt's time. Only today painting is an art form almost totally divorced from reality. As photography gradually assumed the visual communication role, painting turned abstract and became art.

An inflated price is one of the indicators that a discipline has become an art form. When your great-great-grandfather had his portrait painted for posterity by the local artist, he probably paid for the work by the hour, at a modest hourly rate. Now that painting is an art form, the sky's the limit.

A decade ago Portrait of Dr. Gachet by Vincent van Gogh went to a Japanese buyer for $82.5 million. If Dr. Gachet had wanted to let his descendants know what he looked like, he could have had a photograph made and saved someone quite a few dollars.

Art has no function; therefore art has no limit on what it is worth. Art is worth what someone is willing to pay for it. Interestingly enough, that price depends primarily on the publicity a painting has received in the media, not on the amount of advertising run by Sotheby's or Christie's. Sculpture was once used to create icons or gods. Now that most people no longer believe in stone, brass, or wood gods, sculpture has become an art form. No park in America would be complete without a generous assortment of metal or stone objects, but few people worship them. Sculpture is now art.

Like sculpture, painting, and poetry, advertising is taking the same path. "Advertising," said Marshall McLuhan, "is the greatest art form of the twentieth century"

Not only pundits like McLuhan but also top-level advertising people working in the trenches are making the art connection. Mark Fenske, a highly regarded advertising copywriter known for his work on Nike and other brands, says, "It may be the most powerful art form on earth." Advertising legend George Lois entitled his magnum opus, The Art of Advertising: George Lois on Mass Communications.

Major museums around the world house permanent collections of advertisements. Absolut vodka posters are framed and hung on walls like paintings. An exhibition of Ivory soap ads is on display at the Smithsonian; Coke commercials are in the Library of Congress, and the Museum of Modern Art owns a collection of TV spots.

Walk into the offices of virtually any advertising agency in the world and look at the walls. You would think you're in an art museum—wall after wall of advertisements set in impressive mattes and expensively framed.

Hold the phone, you might be thinking. Agencies are just exhibiting samples of their work. Maybe so, but lawyers don't frame copies of their finest briefs. Nor do doctors exhibit pictures of their most brilliant surgeries. We have never visited any advertising agency and seen framed sales charts for the agency's clients.

Advertising is dead!

When a communication technique loses its functional purpose, it turns into an art form.


Tuesday, July 27, 2010

false leisure

Most Americans divide their lives in two, work and play, earning and consuming; they drag themselves through work to reach the promised land of leisure, the ecstasy of the defining car, suit, house, or vacation that settles for all time who they are. The disgust with work makes the act of buying things an arena of anxiety and triumph. Alienation exists at all levels of American society. It is called consumerism.


         





Priceless

Even when advertisers tell us that something is priceless, they manage to put a price on it. In 1998 MasterCard had a campaign with the tagline, "There are some things money can't buy. For everything else there is MasterCard." One commercial shows a father and son at a baseball game. It places a dollar value on lots of things related to the game—tickets, snacks, an autographed baseball—but rates "real conversation with an 11-year old" as priceless. Other commercials in the campaign also link intangible emotions with activities that cost money. The ostensible message of the commercial is that you can't put a price on what is most valuable in life...but the underlying message is that sure you can. You can not only put a price on it, you can put it on a credit card.



This is the issue with advertising in that it commodifies human relationships. One must buy something to express one's love. Simply having a conversation with a son doesn't suffice. You have to buy him a new Playstation or a new Lexus if you really want to show him you love him. 

On a related note, this is what capitalism does. It commodifies everything it touches. Traditions and religions are toss asundered. Market price becomes the main determinant of value. Ethics are disrupted as the market becomes the transcendental signifier. The market increasingly mediates relations between people and all things.


But you can't take this argument too far. Karl Marx:


The bourgeoisie, wherever it has got the upper hand, has put an end to all feudal, patriarchal, idyllic relations. It has pitilessly torn asunder the motley feudal ties that bound man to his "natural superiors," and has left remaining no other nexus between man and man than naked self-interest, than callous "cash payment." It has drowned the most heavenly ecstasies of religious fervour, of chivalrous enthusiasm, of philistine sentimentalism, in the icy water of egotistical calculation. It has resolved personal worth into exchange value, and in place of the numberless indefeasible chartered freedoms, has set up that single, unconscionable freedom—Free Trade. In one word, for exploitation, veiled by religious and political illusions, it has substituted naked, shameless, direct, brutal exploitation. 

The Marxist critique of capitalism is interesting to read in hindsight. We all know the wonders that communism did for the working class in countries such as the late Soviet Union, China, North Korea, and Cuba. Capitalism is net-net a good thing. It provided the wealth and foundation from which democracy could grow. Capitalism is a tool and one that needs to be used wisely. 




Thursday, July 1, 2010

Pornography

Men watch pornography. It's a fact. Men get horny and they need something to satisfy it. Often pornography is the easiest and most convenient way to do it, regardless of whether one is in a relationship or not. Women have a hard time understanding that men can often separate sex from love--for example, men can have sex with a woman they clearly don't love. Women have a harder time doing this because of biological and cultural reasons (hormones, risks of getting pregnant).

Is pornography a problem? I don't think so, because most if not all men watch pornography regularly. It's been around for a while and I don't see a social breakdown in society or men increasingly treating their women in a negative way. Pornography is to men what chocolate and sweets are to a woman. Biological desire. Nothing more, nothing less.

But, feminists argue that pornography is bad because it objectifies women and treats them as sexual commodities. It treats a relationship between a man and woman on purely sexual terms. If that were true, why would a man stick around if all he cared about was sex. What about love, marriage, raising kids? Yeah pornography often demeans women, encourages not-normal sexual practices, and show things that don't happen or should not happen in real life, but movies do the same thing. They are in the business of unreality. Do you think after I watch Terminator 2, I'm going to run around shooting at people? Do you think after I watch the Matrix, I'm going to jump off a building thinking I can fly? People like escapism sometimes.That's what pornography is. Fantasy on video.


The trouble with this wide-open pornography is not that it corrupts, but that it de­sensitizes; not that it unleashes the passions, but that it cripples the emotions; not that it encourages a mature attitude, but that it is a reversion to infantile obses­sions; not that it removes the blinders, but that it distorts the view. Prowess is pro­claimed but love is denied. What we have is not liberation, but dehumanization.

A recent issue of Sky, a magazine targeting young people, contained the fol­lowing letter in the advice column: "My problem is that I don't enjoy sex anymore. I'm a virile 22-year-old. I regularly have sex with my girlfriend, but I have no pleasure anymore.... Is there something that I'm doing wrong?" The advisor replied, "Shootin' air, eh, babe? You've caught the sex problem of the 90's: pelvic apathy...Actually all that's happening to you and your bald best mate of 22 years is that you've both managed to forget there's another human being slaving away at the far end of your plank. Remember that person with the high voice and the lipstick?" This exchange was an unwittingly ironic counterpart to all the "sexy" ads throughout the issue. And how dehumanizing to refer to a woman, someone's lover, as "that person with the high voice and the lipstick."

Meanwhile, Mademoiselle offered this advice to young women whose arms start to ache while pleasuring their partners: "Your best bet—short of looking meaningfully at the bedside clock or developing the forearms of Martina Navratilova—is to get him to give you a hand."

In 1997 NBC featured a story about some college students—men and women—who regularly make a practice of getting drunk together and then hav­ing sex with whomever happens to be nearest at hand. According to one student, it is a great way to get his sexual needs met quickly without the "time-consum­ing" hassle of actually dating and getting to know somebody.

In a world filled with fast-food chains and junk-food advertising, many peo­ple are deliberately starving themselves or gorging themselves into oblivion. Consuming food for which we have no real appetite, we are never satisfied and lose our ability to gauge our own hunger. In a similar way, the barrage of constant sexual images and perfect bodies being offered up to us like delectable pastries (or perhaps popsicles) leave us sexually numb and out of touch with our own de­sire. We can get almost any kind of ethnic food in our own hometowns these days, and we also have more sexual choices than ever before in terms of partners and techniques. But when eating is divorced from hunger and appetite and sex is divorced from desire and relationships, both experiences become onanistic, soli­tary, unfulfilling.


Spiritual Emptiness

People who feel empty make great consumers. The emptier we feel, the more likely we are to turn to products, especially addictive products, to fill us up, to make us feel whole.


Absolut Impotence

Advertisements promise us that alcohol will give us great, passionate sex; the truth is exactly the opposite. Shakespeare put it best when he said that drink "provokes the desire, but it takes away the performance."



Accomplish and Achieve, Don't Accumulate

Debt is Slavery: People go into debt because they want to live a lifestyle beyond what they can afford.

Possessions are a Prison:

When was the best time of your life?

I would guess it's something like:

- The idyllic two weeks at summer camp when you were a child.
- The two-month backpacking trip across Europe.
- The trip to Mazatlan for spring break.
- The winter you spent at Sun Valley as a ski instructor.
- The family road trip across the United States when you were 12.

What's common among these experiences?

- You had the freedom to do whatever you wanted. You had few, if any, obligations.
- You were footloose and fancy-free.
- You weren't burdened down with STUFF.

Debt + Possessions can trap us and force us to do things we don't necessarily want to do.

We borrow money to buy things we don't need and don't use, which forces us to go to a job we hate so we can pay back the money we borrowed to buy things we don't need or use.

Our society focuses on accumulating possesions. Somehow, owning certain stuff is supposed to give us self-worth. Don't define your self-worth by what you own. Instead, concentrate on accumulating accomplishments and experiences, not stuff. Stuff can be stolen, broken, or destroyed.

Nobody can take away what we accomplish. Create something.



Great Marketing Machine

Someone once told me that "status" is "buying things you don't need to impress people you don't know."

American society is focused on status. We want to impress not only our friends, but everyone else, including a lot of people we don't know.

The Great Marketing Machine has brainwashed us into thinking that owning certain stuff will give us status. For example, we are told that we have status, that we're "cool" if we:

- Drive a Lexus, BMW, or Mercedes.
- Golf.
- Wear "Sean Jean" clothes.
- Go trekking in Nepal.
- Exercise by doing Pilates.
- Live in a 3,500+ square foot home.
- Eat at the "right" restaurants.
- Shop at the "right" stores.
- Own a plasma TV.
- Listen to "50 Cent."

(Note that by the time you read this, "Sean Jean" clothes may be out-of-fashion, "50 Cent" may no longer have a best-selling CD, Nepal may no longer be the "hot" vacation spot, and Pilates may have gone the way of "Jazzercise". That's how transient "fashion" is.)

How many people wear "leg-warmers" today? Or "Members Only" jackets? When was the last time you saw someone wear­ing "Gloria Vanderbilt" jeans? Or sporting a haircut like those guys in "Flock of Seagulls?" All of these things were fashion­able once. Today, they're fodder for jokes.

The Great Marketing Machine defines what is fashionable and what is not. Its ubiquitous advertising and marketing affects how we think and what we buy—if we allow it. The music and clothing industries must continually offer new products and convince us to buy them. Ironically, they do this by telling us that what they convinced us to buy yesterday is no longer "in." We are constantly bombarded with lists telling us what's "in" and what's "out."

The Great Marketing Machines wants you to spend your hard-earned money on its overpriced junk. Then it wants you to throw away yesterday's overpriced junk so you can spend your hard-earned money on today's overpriced junk.

Why fall into their trap? Don't be a chump.



Monday, June 28, 2010

anticonsumerism conformity

Do you hate consumer culture? Angry about all that packaging, all those commercials? Worried about the quality of the "mental environment"? Well, join the club. Anticonsumer­ism has become one of the most important cultural forces in millennial North American life, across every social class and demo­graphic. Sure, as a society we may be spending record amounts of money on luxury goods, vacations, designer clothing and house­hold comforts. But take a look at the nonfiction bestseller lists. For years they've been populated by books that are deeply critical of consumerism: No Logo, CultureJam, Luxury Fever, Fast Food Nation. You can now buy Adbusters at your neighborhood music or cloth­ing store. Two of the most popular and critically acclaimed films in the past decade were Fight Club and American Beauty, which offered almost identical indictments of modern consumer society.

What can we conclude from all this? For one thing, the market obviously does an extremely good job at responding to consumer demand for anticonsumerist products and literature. But how can we all denounce consumerism yet still find ourselves living in a consumer society? The answer is simple. What we see in films like American Beauty or books like No Logo is not actually a critique of consumerism; it's merely a restatement of the critique of mass society. The two are not the same. In fact, the critique of mass society has been one of the most powerful forces driving consumerism for the past forty years.

That last sentence is worth reading again. The idea is so foreign, so completely the opposite of what we are used to being told, that many people simply can't get their head around it. So here is the claim, simply put: Books like No Logo, magazines like Adbusters and movies like American Beauty do not undermine consumerism; they reinforce it. This isn't because the authors, editors or directors are hypocrites. It's because they've failed to understand the true nature of consumer society. They identify consumerism with conformity. As a result, they fail to notice that it is rebellion, not conformity, that has for decades been the driving force of the marketplace.

Over the past half-century; we have seen the complete triumph of the consumer economy at the same time that we have seen the absolute dominance of countercultural thinking in the "market­place of ideas." Is this a coincidence? Countercultural theorists would like to think that their rebellion is merely a reaction to the evils of the consumer society. But what if countercultural rebel­lion, rather than being a consequence of intensified consumerism, were actually a contributing factor? Wouldn't that be ironic?


don't conform - buy more of our shit

With the "alternative" facelift, "rebellion" continues to perform its traditional function of justifying the economy's ever-accelerating cycles of obsolescence with admirable efficiency. Since our willingness to load up our closets with purchases depends upon an eternal shifting of the products paraded before us, upon our being endlessly convinced that the new stuff is better than the old, we must be persuaded over and over again that the "alternatives" are more valuable than the existing or the previous. Ever since the 1960's, hip has been the native tongue of advertising, "antiestab­lishment" the vocabulary by which we are taught to cast off our old possessions and buy whatever they have decided to offer this year. And over the years the rebel has naturally become the cen­tral image of this culture of consumption, symbolizing endless, directionless change, and eternal restlessness with "the establish­ment"—or, more correctly, with the stuff "the establishment" convinced him to buy last year.







Monday, June 7, 2010

Advertisement as Pornography

“If we define pornography as any message from any communication medium that is intended to arouse sexual excitement, then it is clear that most advertisements are covertly pornographic.”

- Philip Slater












fast food and pornography








cheap. fast. convenient. but a proxy for the real thing.